Report on the Economic and Social Impacts of the Cyanide Spill and Heavy Metal Pollution in the River Tisza Region - Press Release


The Center for Environmental Studies conducted a unique study, outlining significant effects of the Tisza river cyanide and heavy metal contamination. In contrast to previous documents, which covered ecological damage, this paper assessed economic and social consequences resulting from the accidents. The report was sponsored by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), who intend to maximise the use of this study to lobby for an European Union directive to be established, tackling the environmental impacts of mining activities. If the directive becomes law, then the possibility of such accidents happening in the future can be reduced.

The estimated economic damage totalled US$ 11.4-15 million This sum differs from the US$ 100 million requested compensation by the Office of the Government Commissioner for the Tisza and Szamos rivers. This is due to the fact that the figure does not include the damage and cost of rehabilitation of effected wildlife.

The composition of estimated damage
ACTIVITY
DAMAGE
Costs of early response actions
US$ 975,000
Loss of revenue to fishing and angling
US$ 5,839,000
Revenue losses of businesses in the tourism sector
US$ 4.3-7.8 million
Marketing expenditures
US$ 325,000
TOTAL
US$ 11.4-15 million

Further damage may occur in the future, increasing the total costs of the Tisza river cyanide and heavy metal contamination.. In the case of fishing for instance, the totals might be influenced by the pace of regeneration of fish stocks. The lower development capacity of the Tisza region also supports the prediction of future damages being severely felt.

The report lists the damages from a range of sectors and activities, including the costs of early response actions; the revenue lost by fishing and angling; the revenue losses felt by the tourism sector and tourist related activities as well as the excess expenditures related to the marketing actions that were taken to combat the Tisza river's impaired image. Furthermore, the study examines the financial damage to the business sector and the effect of the contamination on the value of real estate properties. Assessment of forgone revenue (i.e. predicted future revenue losses) is an essential factor in damage evaluation.

A substantial amount of money was required to implement early response actions, involving those activities closely connected to pollution abatement arising during or just after the contamination. Such activities included the prevention, collection and disposition of fish carcasses and primary clean-up costs. The estimated costs resulting from early response actions were about US$ 975,000, with most of this being paid by governmental institutions.

In the case of fishing activity, the market value of the deceased fish was said to have totalled US$ 2,840,000. Future damage prediction, incorporating the lower reproductive capacity of remaining fish stocks, is estimated (US$ 2,840,000) to at least double from initial costs. The damage felt by fisherman corporations due to the contamination is estimated to be US$ 78,000. The forgone revenue of angling is estimated at around US$ 81,000, derived from calculating the number of unsold angling permits predicted. This sum is probably slightly underestimated as not all angling organisations were reviewed. The total damage felt by the region’s fishing and angling sector was some US$ 5,839,000.

The cyanide contamination had a dramatic effect on the region's tourism sector. Wild water canoeing activity dramatically decreased by around 90% after the contamination events. This is due to the clear data that, instead of the usual 18-20,000 guests hosted in the Tisza region per year, only about 1,500 visited in 2000.

Along the banks of the Lake Tisza, the observed 33% reduction in the number of German and Austrian tourists was the most striking and severe loss to the region’s tourism. The vanishing of regular customers was shocking to local businesses. The decrease in the number of foreign angling tourists is complete (i.e. nearing 100%) even in those areas of the Lake Tisza which were relatively unaffected by the contamination. Another sign of the rapid loss of foreign investment is the fact that the number and value of real estate properties bought by foreigners in the vicinity of the Lake Tisza region has halved compared with those figures from 1999.

On the lower section of the river Tisza, the decrease in the number of tourists was also considerable: the city of Csongrad reported an 80% drop and even Martely, a tourist resort in the vicinity of the Tisza river, which was unaffected by the contamination, experienced a 30% drop. The vast majority of Tisza settlements reported tourism losses, while the overall tourism turnover of Hungary grew. Up to the end of the main Tisza tourism season in 2000, around 300,000 guest nights were lost. It generated a US$ 2.9-4.9 million revenue loss. The total damage to the tourism sector - complete with estimated future losses - totals around US$ 4.3-7.8 million.

These losses are particularly painful in a region that has very few operating enterprises and alternatives. Losses per entrepreneur are considerably high compared with the size of these enterprises. The reduction in turnover was so significant that not only the annual profit was challenged but also the main season itself made a loss. For example, due to such a reduced turnover, camping at Tivadar, one of the usual stops for wild-water canoers, did not even open in the peak summer season of 2000. Tourist businesses generally balance their year round deficit from the profits of the peak season, so the economic damage felt compelled the entrepreneurs to use a significant amount of their financial reserves.

Nevertheless, the main economic damage of the cyanide contamination - and the following heavy metal contamination - are their continuing effects into the future. The cyanide contamination introduced a new risk category to the Tisza region. As a result, from now on, businesses shall integrate any investment opportunities with the disturbing possibility that a major river contamination may happen - killing the river's wildlife, ruining the river's image and scaring off tourists.

For the Tisza region, which is underdeveloped compared to other regions in Hungary, tourism promised a new sector of economic development. Local tourism could use the region's unrivalled natural scenery to promote the tourism sector even outside of Hungary. A range of investment were taking place in local areas of the Tisza region, prior to the contamination, with promising developments occurring along the Tisza river and especially along the Lake Tisza. For example, there were schemes for enhancing the quality of wild water canoeing facilities, by building ports and modernising camping sites. However, the potential source of these investments disintegrated with the contamination.

The local tourist businesses utilised the majority of their monetary reserves to survive. In addition, heavy deficits and the risk of further river contamination significantly reduced the chance of bank credit being granted to local businesses and decreased the likelihood of businesses being encouraged to invest in the region. In fact, even state development assistance is financially unbalanced as the system logically favours giving loans to businesses who are able to prove their creditworthiness and profitability.

The reduction in tourist turnover has not only affected the tourism sector, having an overall effect on the region's economy. Soon after the cyanide contamination broke out, the Tokaj municipality collected estimations from city entrepreneurs in order to ascertain the likely level of compensation required. According to the findings, businesses involved in fuel retailing and catering expected immense losses.

In order to compare anticipated and actual losses by the autumn of 2000, the Center for Environmental Studies interviewed a number of the respondents from the initial, Tokaj municipality co-ordinated survey about their actual losses. The answers indicated that the anticipated damage had not been exaggerated. In fact, in some sectors the economic losses surpassed the anticipated amounts. However, local entrepreneurs also argued that besides the lower number of tourists, weaker local demand was also a cause for the reduction in the turnover of retail stores. To summarise, the turnover of tourist agencies dropped by an average 80%, turnover of catering and accommodation services decreased by 40%, while food retailing businesses lost around 20% of it’s major turnover. In other types of retail shops, including petrol filling stations, the loss in revenue was between 10 and 40%.

The report concludes with the following statements and suggestions in regard to how the Tisza region can facilitate future economic progression, enabling the region to break out of its current, laggard state: -

  • The contamination of the river should never happen again. Further contamination would represent a major blow to the local economy. It would clearly ruin the river's image even more and the unfavourable tendencies that prevailed in the year 2000 would continue for a long time.


  • The cyanide contamination harmed probably the most important resource of the Tisza region - its unique natural environment. If the region's ability to attract tourists continues to be extremely challenging the split in the level of development between the region and the most developed parts of the country will continue to increase. A successful development process may begin if, instead of implementing centrally co-ordinated countrywide development objectives, the regional and local micro regions can use development subsidies according to their own needs, in essence managing their own budget. However, this would need a reform of the current regional development system.


  • Co-operation between local businesses should be strengthened because such a synergetic process can vitalise the whole Tisza region and create a more economically secure environment, ripe for future investment. The success of complex development programmes depends on the co-operation of local businesses.


  • Back
    Home